SECONDARY URETEROPELVIC JUNCTION OBSTRUCTION: ENDOPYELOTOMY A BETTER OPTION
Main Article Content
Abstract
Objective: To evaluate the outcome of percutaneous antegrade endopyelot -omy as a primary intervention for Secondary Ureteropelvic junction (UPJ) ob-struction.
Methodology: This study was conducted from 20th January 2011 to 19th
January 2012 at Institute of Kidney diseases, Hayatabad, Peshawar. A sample
of 31 cases having evidence of secondary ureteropelvic obstruction were list-ed for the study of which 21 cases as males and the rest females. Ultrasound,
intravenous urogram and DTPA Scanwere carried out. Patients with severe
hydronephrosis, renal function <30%, anterior crossing vessel and UPJ>2 cm
stenosed segment were not included in the study. Stenosed segment was
incised posterior-laterally until periureteral and peripelvic fat was visualized.
At completion of 8 weeks postoperatively the ureteric stents were removed
as day cases and the patients were evaluated at follow-up of 3 months and
every subsequent 6 months in the out-patient department with data relevant
collected on a predesigned proforma.
Results: Demographically the findings were observed and mean age at both
sexes was similar. The mean split GFR on the affected side was 36.5 mg/ml.
The average time taken to completion of the procedure was 63 min. Hospital
stay averaged 3.8 days (ranging form 2–6 days). Success rate was 81% (25 of
31) at 10.25 months. Failure was noted clinically in 6 cases with presentation
variably at completion of first to the third month postoperatively.
Conclusion: Percutaneous antegrade endopyelotomy has significant advan-tages in term of reduced hospital stay, shorter operative time, early postoper -ative recovery, minimal morbidity and decreased postoperative analgesic re-quirements. It is successful in selected patient who have good renal functions,
no crossing vessels, mild to moderate hydronephrosis and dependent ureters.
Methodology: This study was conducted from 20th January 2011 to 19th
January 2012 at Institute of Kidney diseases, Hayatabad, Peshawar. A sample
of 31 cases having evidence of secondary ureteropelvic obstruction were list-ed for the study of which 21 cases as males and the rest females. Ultrasound,
intravenous urogram and DTPA Scanwere carried out. Patients with severe
hydronephrosis, renal function <30%, anterior crossing vessel and UPJ>2 cm
stenosed segment were not included in the study. Stenosed segment was
incised posterior-laterally until periureteral and peripelvic fat was visualized.
At completion of 8 weeks postoperatively the ureteric stents were removed
as day cases and the patients were evaluated at follow-up of 3 months and
every subsequent 6 months in the out-patient department with data relevant
collected on a predesigned proforma.
Results: Demographically the findings were observed and mean age at both
sexes was similar. The mean split GFR on the affected side was 36.5 mg/ml.
The average time taken to completion of the procedure was 63 min. Hospital
stay averaged 3.8 days (ranging form 2–6 days). Success rate was 81% (25 of
31) at 10.25 months. Failure was noted clinically in 6 cases with presentation
variably at completion of first to the third month postoperatively.
Conclusion: Percutaneous antegrade endopyelotomy has significant advan-tages in term of reduced hospital stay, shorter operative time, early postoper -ative recovery, minimal morbidity and decreased postoperative analgesic re-quirements. It is successful in selected patient who have good renal functions,
no crossing vessels, mild to moderate hydronephrosis and dependent ureters.
Article Details
How to Cite
1.
Ahmad T. SECONDARY URETEROPELVIC JUNCTION OBSTRUCTION: ENDOPYELOTOMY A BETTER OPTION. J Postgrad Med Inst [Internet]. 2016 Jan. 3 [cited 2024 Oct. 5];29(4). Available from: https://jpmi.org.pk/index.php/jpmi/article/view/1644
Issue
Section
Original Article
Work published in JPMI is licensed under a
Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 2.0 Generic License.
Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work.