Prevalence of Urinary tract infection in Pregnant women of Peshawar NWFP : A single center study
Main Article Content
Abstract
This study was conducted to determine the prevalence of urinary tract infection (UTI) in pregnant women in Peshawar. This study was conducted in the department of Pathology, KTH, Peshawar. 115 pregnant and 60 non-pregnant women between 16 - 45 years of age were included. Mid stream urine specimens were collected, examined, culture and sensitivity was done. organisms were identified using biochemical tests. Out of 115 pregnant women, 34 were found to be suffering from UTI with a prevalence rate of 29.57% and out of 60 control women, 14(23.33%) were found to be suffering from UTI. The prevalence of UTI significantly increased with parity, however duration of pregnancy was not significantly associated with it. Patients having past history of urological problems showed more susceptiblity to UTI. The prevalence of different pathogenes isolated were escherichia coli (21.74%) pseudomonas spp. (12.6%), Klebsiella spp. (1.74%), Proteus spp. (0.87%) Staphylococcus epidermitis (0.87%), Staphylococcus saphrophyticus (0.87%) and Citrobacter spp. (0.87%). Although symptoms play a major role in diagnosis but we did not find any correlation ofsymptoms with the prevalence UTI. UTI occurs in all age groups of pregnant and control women, however with increasing age, the prevalence of UTI significantly increases. Prevalence of UTI increases with parity.
Article Details
How to Cite
1.
Ahmad J, Shah A, Ali NS. Prevalence of Urinary tract infection in Pregnant women of Peshawar NWFP : A single center study. J Postgrad Med Inst [Internet]. 2011 Sep. 23 [cited 2024 Dec. 22];17(2). Available from: https://jpmi.org.pk/index.php/jpmi/article/view/821
Issue
Section
Original Article
Work published in JPMI is licensed under a
Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 2.0 Generic License.
Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work.