POST OPERATIVE OUTCOMES OF OPEN VERSUS CLOSED HAEMORRHOIDECTOMY

Abstract

Objective:

Methodology:

nd, 3rd and 4th

Results:

 

The mean age of the sample was 45.5±2.3 years. In group B, 08 (32%) patients had mild pain, 10

(40%) had moderate and 02 (08%) had sever pain post operatively as compared to 13 (52%) patients with

mild, 11(44%) with moderate and 06 (24%) with severe pain in group A (p < 0.05). Similarly early post

operative bleeding was noted in 15 (60%) patients in group A and 06 (24%) patients in group B (p <

0.05). Wound healing time was just over 02 weeks in group B as compared to more than 04 weeks in group

A (p < 0.05).

Conclusion:

degree haemorrhoids.

Closed haemorrhoidectomy technique is much better than open technique for 2nd, 3rd and 4

th

degree haemorrhoids having no

systemic illnesses were included in this study. Patients were randomly divided in two equal groups. Group

A included patients undergoing open haemorrhoidectomy and group B catered for patient with closed

haemorrhoidectomies. Post operatively these patients were followed up in the OPD for 02 months and were

evaluated for post operative pain, bleeding and wound healing in addition to other complications like

urinary retention and anal fissure.

This experimental study was carried out in the surgical unit, at Hayatabad Medical Complex

Peshawar from March to August 2009. Fifty patients of 2

To compare the therapeutic results of open haemorrhoidectomy with closed one in terms of post

operative pain, bleeding and wound healing.