CLINICIANS APPROACH TO EUTHANASIA IN THE PROVINCE OF KHYBER PAKHTUNKHWA
Article Sidebar
Published:
Dec 12, 2015
Keywords:
Euthanasia, Euthanasia Legalization, Mercy Killing
Main Article Content
Abstract
Objective: To determine the knowledge of clinicians and their opinion about
legalization, obstacles in practicing euthanasia and factors that may compel
them to practice euthanasia.
Methodology: A questionnaire based descriptive study was conducted at
public and private hospitals of Khyber Pakhtunkhwa. A questionnaire was dis-tributed randomly to 540 doctors of different specialties and general practi -tioners. Questions were related to their knowledge, views about legalization,
factors and obstacles in practicing euthanasia. The questionnaire was collect -ed from the doctors who filled the form and consented to participate in the
study.
Results: The response rate was 55%, among them 79% were males. Only 61%
(185) knew the meaning of euthanasia, whereas 36% (109) knew about its
guidelines and 2% (6) had no knowledge of euthanasia.
Amongst clinicians who knew about euthanasia, 84% did not and 16% agreed
with its legalization. Reasons mentioned for disagreement with its legalization
were religion 95%, moral 61%, ethical 44%, emotional 41% and social 37%.
Of those clinicians who agreed with its legalization, 90% would and 10%
would not practice it on their patients. Out of them 40% would adopt no re-suscitation method, 40% would administer lethal drugs and 20% would with -hold or withdraw the treatment.
Conclusion: Majority of responding clinicians were not aware of euthanasia
and any related guidelines. They disagreed with the practice as well as legal-ization of euthanasia.
legalization, obstacles in practicing euthanasia and factors that may compel
them to practice euthanasia.
Methodology: A questionnaire based descriptive study was conducted at
public and private hospitals of Khyber Pakhtunkhwa. A questionnaire was dis-tributed randomly to 540 doctors of different specialties and general practi -tioners. Questions were related to their knowledge, views about legalization,
factors and obstacles in practicing euthanasia. The questionnaire was collect -ed from the doctors who filled the form and consented to participate in the
study.
Results: The response rate was 55%, among them 79% were males. Only 61%
(185) knew the meaning of euthanasia, whereas 36% (109) knew about its
guidelines and 2% (6) had no knowledge of euthanasia.
Amongst clinicians who knew about euthanasia, 84% did not and 16% agreed
with its legalization. Reasons mentioned for disagreement with its legalization
were religion 95%, moral 61%, ethical 44%, emotional 41% and social 37%.
Of those clinicians who agreed with its legalization, 90% would and 10%
would not practice it on their patients. Out of them 40% would adopt no re-suscitation method, 40% would administer lethal drugs and 20% would with -hold or withdraw the treatment.
Conclusion: Majority of responding clinicians were not aware of euthanasia
and any related guidelines. They disagreed with the practice as well as legal-ization of euthanasia.
Article Details
How to Cite
1.
Khan MA, Javaid A, Sajjad H, Ahmad F, Khattak A, Khan N, Adnan MA- ur-R. CLINICIANS APPROACH TO EUTHANASIA IN THE PROVINCE OF KHYBER PAKHTUNKHWA. J Postgrad Med Inst [Internet]. 2015 Dec. 12 [cited 2024 Nov. 22];29(3). Available from: https://jpmi.org.pk/index.php/jpmi/article/view/1831
Issue
Section
Original Article
Work published in JPMI is licensed under a
Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 2.0 Generic License.
Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work.