INCIDENCE AND OUTCOME OF NASAL AND GROIN METHICILLIN-RESISTANT STAPHYLOCOCCUS AUREUS CARRIER STATE IN PATIENTS ADMITTED FOR ROUTINE CARDIAC SURGERY
Main Article Content
Abstract
Objective: To find out the incidence of nasal and groin Methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus
(MRSA) carrier status in patients undergoing routine cardiac surgery and to study its effect on postoperative
wound infections with MRSA.
Material and Methods: Patients undergoing routine cardiac surgery between 30-04-2007 and 31-10-
2007 at Rehman Medical Institute, Peshawar were enrolled in the study. Nasal and groin swabs were taken
on admission to check for MRSA carriage. Patients requiring emergency surgery were not included in the
study. Swabs for culture and sensitivity were taken from patients with post-operative surgical wound
discharge. The post-operative wound infections were compared in the MRSA carrier (carrier group) and
non-carrier (control group) groups.
Results: Out of 333 (297 open-heart and 36 close-heart) patients undergoing routine cardiac surgery
during this period, 52 (18 %) open and 2 (6 %) close heart patients had either nasal or groin or both
swabs positive for MRSA. Two patients developed post-operative mediastinitis; one of them was with MRSA
from the control group. The patient with mediastinitis with organisms other than MRSA was excluded from
study. Two other open-heart patients, one from each group, developed superficial sternotomy wound
infection with MRSA. The difference in the incidence of post-operative wound infections with MRSA in the
two groups was not significant statistically. All patients who developed surgical site infection with MRSA
were diabetic.
Conclusion: Pre-operative MRSA carriers, undergoing elective cardiac surgery, did not have a
statistically significant higher incidence of post-operative MRSA wound infections.
Article Details
Work published in JPMI is licensed under a
Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 2.0 Generic License.
Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work.