Family Physicians vs Other Specialists: A Cross-sectional Analysis of Patients’ Preferences and Factors Influencing Physician Choice in Pakistan Factors Influencing Physician Choice in Pakistan
Main Article Content
Abstract
Objective:
This study aims to examine the factors influencing patients' choices of physicians, alongside their awareness and attitudes towards Family Physicians (FPs).
Methods
It was a nationwide cross-sectional study conducted between September 2023 and March 2024. Data was collected on participant demographics, awareness of the role of FPs, and choice of physician for different health conditions. Descriptive analysis assessed knowledge and attitudes towards Family Medicine (FM). One-way ANOVA and T-test evaluated the associations between demographic factors and the mean frequency of selecting a FP for various conditions, with significance set at p < 0.05.
Results
The final sample consisted of 341 participants with a median age of 26 years. Only 184 (54%) respondents knew about the qualifications of a FP, and for most health conditions, the majority preferred to consult other healthcare workers instead of FPs. Participants over 26 years had a significantly higher mean frequency (4.1 ± 2.64) of selecting FPs for health conditions as compared to those below 26 years (3.1 ± 2.42, p=0.000). Among participants who preferred a FP, convenient location and easier appointment scheduling were common factors influencing their choice.
Conclusion
There was a significant gap in awareness and preference for FPs, with age as an important contributing factor. To increase the utilization of FM services, further initiatives are needed to raise awareness and improve access.
Article Details
Work published in JPMI is licensed under a
Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 2.0 Generic License.
Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work.
References
1. Alshammrani BM, Aljuhani RO, Basaqr KM, Bin Mahfouz EA, Alhawsawi EM, Alqahtani R. Public awareness and perception of family medicine in Jeddah, Saudi Arabia. Cureus. 2022;14(3):e23320.
2. Tejani FA, Rashid MA. Enhancing family medicine training to build capacity in Pakistan: a call for action. Educ Prim Care. 2023;34(5-6):240-243.
3. Arghittu A, Castiglia P, Dettori M. Family medicine and primary healthcare: the past, present and future. Healthcare (Basel). 2023;11(15):2157.
4. Kakakhel SI, Mahmood H, Khan J, Makey G, Arif M, Jamil S, et al. Assessment of referral patterns and utilization of basic health facilities in the outpatient department of a tertiary care hospital: a cross sectional study. Pak J Health Sci. 2023;4(5):42-46.
5. Haider S, Shabbir S, Tariq M, Nayeem A, Shafique H, Sahitia S. Socioeconomic determinants of access to primary healthcare in rural population of Sindh, Pakistan. Pak J Health Sci. 2025;6(3):223-228.
6. Bograin KI, Almohsin RB, Al-Khabbaz Z, Allabad F, AlShaikh E, Sarhan Z, et al. Perception, attitude, and satisfaction of the public from family medicine in Saudi Arabia. Int J Med Dev Ctries. 2019;3(3):243-249.
7. Huda SA, Samani ZA, Qidwai W. Perception about family physicians: results of a survey of patients visiting specialist clinics for treatment. J Pak Med Assoc. 2004;54(11):589-592.
8. Sullivan KM, Dean A, Soe MM. OpenEpi: a web-based epidemiologic and statistical calculator for public health. Public Health Rep. 2009;124(3):471-474.
9. Dean AG, Sullivan KM, Soe MM. OpenEpi: open source epidemiologic statistics for public health, version 2.3.1 [Internet]. 2010 [cited 2025 Oct 10]. Available from: https://www.openepi.com
10. World Medical Association. World Medical Association Declaration of Helsinki: ethical principles for medical research involving human subjects. JAMA. 2013;310(20):2191-2194.
11. International Conference on Harmonisation. ICH harmonised tripartite guideline: guideline for good clinical practice. J Postgrad Med. 2001;47(1):45-50.
12. Elagi AAA, Jaber BA, Wassly AHA, Ahmed RMS, Bosily FAA. Public perception and satisfaction on the role and services provided by family physicians in Saudi Arabia: a cross sectional study. J Family Med Prim Care. 2019;8(10):3282-3286.
13. Mohamoud G, Mash B, Merali M, Orwa J, Mahoney M. Perceptions regarding the scope of practice of family doctors amongst patients in primary care settings in Nairobi. Afr J Prim Health Care Fam Med. 2018;10(1):e1-e7.
14. Aldhamadi MA, Alzahrani FA. The public perception of and attitude toward primary healthcare centers in comparison to other specialties among the Saudi community. J Family Med Prim Care. 2019;8(6):1895-1901.
15. Zhang L, Zhang P, Chen W. Can family doctor system improve health service utilization for patients with hypertension and diabetes in China? A difference-in-differences study. BMC Health Serv Res. 2024;24(1):454.
16. Mercado F, Mercado M, Myers N, Hewit M, Haller NA. Patient preferences in choosing a primary care physician. J Prim Care Community Health. 2012;3(2):125-131.
17. Lin MH, Chang HT, Chen TJ, Hwang SJ. Why people select the outpatient clinic of medical centers: a nationwide analysis in Taiwan. PeerJ. 2020;8:e9829.
18. Khatami F, Shariati M, Khedmat L, Bahmani M. Patients' preferences in selecting family physician in primary health centers: a qualitative-quantitative approach. BMC Fam Pract. 2020;21(1):107.