CYSTOID MACULAR EDEMA IN POST CATARACT SURGERY PATIENTS; A COMPARISON OF THREE DIFFERENT SURGICAL PROCEDURES
Main Article Content
Abstract
Objective: To determine the frequency of post cataract cystoid macular edema (CME) in three different types of cataract surgical procedures. Methodology: This was a cross sectional study. Total 222 patients having age related cataract were enrolled. Pre-operative optical coherence tomography (OCT) was performed to measure central macular thickness. Patients were then randomly allocated to three groups on the basis of type of surgical procedure; group A underwent phacoemulsification, group B, manual small incision cataract surgery (MSICS) and group C, extra capsular cataract surgery (ECCE). Post-operative OCT was done 06 weeks after surgery and the macular thickness was compared to pre-operative values for diagnosis of CME. The CME was then compared among the three groups. Results: Male were 115 and female were 107. Mean age of the patients was 53.38 + 7.44 years, (41 to 70 years). A total of 27 (12.16%) patients had CME following cataract surgery, 04 (5.12%) in group A , 06 (7.79%) in group B, 17 (25.37%) patients in group C had CME after surgery. Chi-square test was utilized for comparison of CME among the groups. Conclusion: The frequency of CME following cataract surgery was low. Phacoemulsification and MSICS gave almost similar, lower rates results while ECCE was found to have higher rates of CME.
Article Details
How to Cite
1.
Khan SAR, Jan W, Irfan M, Khalil MZ. CYSTOID MACULAR EDEMA IN POST CATARACT SURGERY PATIENTS; A COMPARISON OF THREE DIFFERENT SURGICAL PROCEDURES. J Postgrad Med Inst [Internet]. 2020 Oct. 22 [cited 2024 Nov. 23];34(2). Available from: https://jpmi.org.pk/index.php/jpmi/article/view/2656
Section
Original Article
Work published in JPMI is licensed under a
Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 2.0 Generic License.
Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work.