DIAGNOSTIC VALUE OF FINE NEEDLE ASPIRATION CYTOLOGY IN DIAGNOSIS OF NON-THYROIDAL NECK MASSES
Main Article Content
Abstract
Objective:
Methodology:
Results:
Conclusion:
Fine needle aspiration cytology for non-thyroidal neck masses has equal diagnostic yield to
open biopsy.
The findings were TB 31%, metastatic lymph node 19%, reactive lymphadenopathy 9%,
lymphoproliferative disease 11%, pleomorphic adenoma 8%, thyroglossal cyst 5%, carotid body tumour
4%, lipoma and branchial cysts were 3% each, sialolithiasis 2% and one case each of dermoid, sebaceous
cyst, adenoid cystic carcinoma, Kikuchi's disease and Ewing's tumour. Correlation of FNAC with biopsy
was for TB; true positive, 64.5%, true negative 29.03%, false positive 3.22%, false negative 3.22% and for
metastatic lymph node true positive 57.89%, true negative 36.84%, false positive 5.26% and no case of
false negative. The diagnostic yield of FNAC was for TB, accuracy, sensitivity, specificity, positive
predictive value and negative predictive value were 93.54%, 95.23%, 90%, 95.23% and 90% respectively.
Metastatic lymph nodes accuracy sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value and negative predictive
value were 94.73%, 100%, 87.5%, 91.66% and 100% respectively. Overall diagnostic value of FNAC in
non-thyroidal neck masses with regard to accuracy, sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value and
negative predictive value were 90%, 90%, 77.42%, 90.41%, 90.41%, and 88.89% respectively.
This descriptive study was conducted at the Department of ENT, Lady Reading Hospital
Peshawar from January to December 2009. Hundred patients with non-thyroidal neck masses fulfilling the
inclusion criteria were included in the study. Fine needle aspirations were performed by the same
cytopathologist.
To determine the diagnostic value of fine needle aspiration cytology in the diagnosis of nonthyroidal
neck masses.
Article Details
Work published in JPMI is licensed under a
Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 2.0 Generic License.
Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work.