COMPARISON AND CORRELATION BETWEEN MANDIBULAR ANTEGONIAL NOTCH DEPTH AND RAMUS MORPHOLOGY AMONG DIFFERENT PATTERNS OF GROWTH IN SKELETAL CLASS I, II AND III MALOCCLUSION SUBJECTS: AN OBSERVATIONAL STUDY
Article Sidebar
Main Article Content
Abstract
Objective: To provide a comprehensive comparison and correlation of these indicators among all skeletal patterns.
Methodology: A total of 180 lateral cephalograms (81 males, 99 females) of patients between ages 18 to 25 years, were distributed equally (60 each) among class I, II, and III malocclusion groups in this observational study conducted at AFID, Rawalpindi. These were further sub-grouped (20 each) as average, horizontal and vertical growth patterns based on Jarabak’s ratio.
Results: The AND was considerably deep in class I and class II vertical growers (p < 0.01) than in average and horizontal growers. Also, RH values were greatest for class I and class II horizontal growers (p < 0.05). In class I vertical group, a strong relationship between RH and RW (r=0.521) was observed. In class II horizontal group, AND showed a negative correlation with RH (r= -0.520) and RW (r= -0.516). In class III average group, RW was significantly correlated with RH (r=0.50) and AND (r=0.489).
Conclusion: Vertical growers manifested the greatest AND values contrasted to both average and horizontal growers except class III subjects. Ramal height and width measurements were greatest in horizontal growers as opposed to the other two forms. Also, correlation exists between mandibular morphology and growth pattern. Thus, a thorough knowledge of varying mandibular anatomical patterning for all malocclusion groups is essential for diagnosis and treatment planning.
Article Details
Work published in JPMI is licensed under a
Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 2.0 Generic License.
Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work.
References
Gupta S, Dhingra P, Chatha S. A study of comparison and correlation between antegonial notch depth, symphysis mor¬phology, and ramus morphology among different growth patterns in angle’s Class II Division 1 Malocclusion. Ind J Dent Sci. 2018;10(1):21. DOI:10.4103/ ijds.ijds_109_17
Abirami S, George Am, Varghese Rm. Correlation Between Antegonial Notch Depth, Symphysis Morphology And Ramus Length In Different Growth Pat¬terns Of Angle’s Class Ii Div 2 Subjects. European Journal Of Molecular & Clini¬cal Medicine. 2020;7(01):1134-39.
Bjork A. Prediction of mandibular growth rotation. Am J Orthod. 1969;55(6):585- 99. DOI:10.1016/0002- 9416(69)90036-0.
Björk A, Skieller V. Normal and abnor¬mal growth of the mandible. A synthesis of longitudinal cephalometric implant studies over a period of 25 years. Eur J Orthod. 1983;5(1):1-46. DOI:10.1093/ ejo/5.1.1.
Björk A. The use of metallic implants in the study of facial growth in chil¬dren: method and application. Am J Phys Anthropol. 1968;29(2):243-54. DOI:10.1002/ajpa.1330290217.
Dr Irfan Basha S DAN, Dr. Sindhu D, Dr. Ranjitha G, Dr. Nirajita Bhaduri,, Dr. Sanjula Sinha DGJ. Comparison and correlation between antegonial notch depth, symphysis morphology and Curvature of mandibular canal among different growth patterns in angle's class ii Division 1 malocclusion : A ra-diographic study. Int J Sci Res Eng Dev. 2020;5(3):139-48.
Roshni Mahajan1 RT, Garg A, Tripathi A. Amit Singh Choudhary. Comparison and correlation between mandibular morphology among diferent vertical growth patterns: A cephalometric study. Journal of Contemporary Orthodontics. 2022;6(1):14–9.
Muller G. Growth and development of the middle face. 1963;42(1):385-99. DOI: 10.1177/0022034563042001460
Kisan R, Nehete A, Gulve N, Shah K, Aher S. A Comparative Evaluation of Antegonial Notch Depth, Symphysis Morphology, Ramus and Mandibular Morphology in Different Growth Pat¬terns in Angle’s Class I Malocclusion: A Cross-Sectional Retrospective Lateral Cephalometric Study in Contemporary Indian Population. Int J of Trend Res Dev. 2020;4(4):1588-952020;4(4): 1588-95
Yassir YA, Al-Mulla AA. Mandibular an¬tegonial notch depth distribution and its relationship with craniofacial morpholo¬gy in different skeletal patterns. J Bagh¬dad Coll Dent. 2009;21:107–11.
Navaneethan A, Remmiya Varghese. Comparison Between Antegonial Notch Depth, Symphysis Morphology and Ramus Morphology Among Differ¬ent Growth Patterns In Skeletal Class I And Class II Subjects. International Journal of Dentistry and Oral Science. 2021;8(1):1510-7.
Jimenez Silva A, Carnevali Arellano R, Vivanco Coke S, Tobar Reyes J, Araya Diaz P, Palomino Montenegro H. Cranio¬facial growth predictors for class II and III malocclusions: A systematic review. Clin Exp Dent Res. 2021;7(2):242-62. DOI:10.1002/cre2.357.
Knigge RP, McNulty KP, Oh H, Har¬din AM, Leary EV, Duren DL, et al. Geometric morphometric analysis of growth patterns among facial types. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 2021;160(3):430-441. DOI:10.1016/j. ajodo.2020.04.038.
Faul F, Erdfelder E, Buchner A, Lang AG. Statistical power analyses us¬ing G*Power 3.1: tests for correlation and regression analyses. Behav Res Methods. 2009 Nov;41(4):1149-60. DOI:10.3758/BRM.41.4.1149.
Periago DR, Scarfe WC, Moshiri M, Scheetz JP, Silveira AM, Farman AG. Linear accuracy and reliability of cone beam CT derived 3-dimensional im¬ages constructed using an orthodon¬tic volumetric rendering program. Angle Orthod. 2008;78(3):387-95. DOI:10.2319/122106-52.1.
BJORK A. Facial growth in man, stud¬ied with the aid of metallic implants. Acta Odontol Scand. 1955;13(1):9-34. DOI:10.3109/00016355509028170.
Singer CP, Mamandras AH, Hunter WS. The depth of the mandibular antegonial notch as an indicator of mandibular growth potential. Am J Orthod Den¬tofacial Orthop. 1987;91(2):117-24. DOI:10.1016/0889-5406(87)90468-9.
Hovell JH. Variations in mandibular form. Ann R Coll Surg Engl. 1965;37(1):1-18.
Lambrechts AH, Harris AM, Rossouw PE, Stander I. Dimensional differ¬ences in the craniofacial morpholo¬gies of groups with deep and shal¬low mandibular antegonial notching. Angle Orthod. 1996;66(4):265-72. (1996)066<0265:DDITCM>2.3.CO;2.
Kolodziej RP, Southard TE, Southard KA, Casko JS, Jakobsen JR. Evaluation of antegonial notch depth for growth pre¬diction. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 2002;121(4):357-63. DOI:10.1067/ mod.2002.121561.
Enlow DH, Moyers RE Merow WW. Handbook of facial growth. WB Saun¬ders Company; 1982.. Handbook of facial growth. WB Saunders Company; 1982.
Nanda SK. Patterns of vertical growth in the face. Am J Orthod Dentofa¬cial Orthop. 1988;93(2):103-16. DOI:10.1016/0889-5406(88)90287-9.
Sassouni V, Nanda S. Analysis of dentofacial vertical proportions. Am J Orthod. 1964;50(11):801–23. DOI:10.1016/0002-9416(64)90039-9
Schudy F. Vertical growth versus antero¬posterior growth as related to function and treatment. 1964;34:75–93.
Mangla R, Singh N, Dua V, Padmanabhan P, Khanna M. Evaluation of mandibular morphology in different facial types. Contemp Clin Dent. 2011;2(3):200-6. DOI:10.4103/0976-237X.86458.