ANORECTAL MALFORMATIONS: FUNCTIONAL OUTCOME OF POSTERIOR SAGITTAL ANORECTOPLASTY
Main Article Content
Abstract
Objective: To assess the functional outcome of patients with anorectal malformations treated with
Posterior Sagittal Anorectoplasty (PSARP).
Material and Methods: This study was conducted on 355 patients with anorectal malformations at Lady
Reading Hospital, Peshawar from July 1998 to July 2004.
Distal loopogram was performed routinely in all patients except the female patients with rectogenital tract
fistula. PSARP was performed in all the patients with intermediate, high type and cloacal malformations.
Operative and postoperative mortality and morbidity was recorded. Regular anal dilatation was advised
after discharge, which was continued for 3-6 months after the PSARP procedure. Patients were followed up
for 6-12 months.
Results: Study included 355 patients (245 boys and 110 girls) ranging in age from 12-36 months. PSARP
was performed in all the patients. There were 195 boys with rectourethral fistula and 95 girls with
genitourinary tract fistula while 5 girls had cloacal malformations. Operative and postoperative mortality
was 9/355 (2.5%). Early functional results were good in 30%, fair in 45% and poor in 25% patients.
Chronic constipation and anal stenosis was found in 99 and 35 patients respectively. Mucosal prolapse
with perineal itching was present in 60 patients. Recurrent UTI and orchitis was found in 5 and 3 patients
respectively. Urethral stricture and urethral diverticulum was found in two cases each, while redo surgery
was performed in two patients.
Conclusion: The incidence of high and intermediate anorectal anomalies was more in male babies. The
PSARP procedure is safe with good functional results in terms of faecal continence.
Article Details
Work published in JPMI is licensed under a
Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 2.0 Generic License.
Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work.