BREAKING BAD NEWS - PERCEPTIONS OF CANCER PATIENTS AND THEIR RELATIVES
Main Article Content
Abstract
Objective:
To study the perceptions of cancer patients and their relatives regarding disclosure of cancer
Methodology:
A cross sectional survey was conducted at Medical Oncology Ward, Hayatabad Medical
Complex, Peshawar from September 2009 to January 2011. A total of 114 patients and their relatives were
interviewed using a pre-designed questionnaire.
Results:
Eighty Three (73%) were male while 31 (27%) were female. Median age of cancer patients was
36 (18-70) years. Forty-eight percent (29/60) cancer patients wished for full disclosure of bad news while
39% (21/54) of their relatives wanted full disclosure (p= Not Significant). Sixty two percent (37/60) cancer
patients and 74% (40/54) relatives wanted to be informed in case of recurrence (p= Not Significant). Over
90% of patients and relatives wanted bad news to be broken by a senior consultant. Fifty eight percent
(35/60) cancer patients and 52% (28/54) relatives wished for their relatives to make treatment decisions
for them (p= Not Significant). However, 93% (56/60) of cancer patients and 78% (42/54) of their relatives
wanted full information about all side-effects of treatment (p < 0.02). Fifty eight percent (35/60) cancer
patients and 32% (17/54) relatives wanted their close relatives to be present while bad news was being
broken (p<0.007).
Conclusion:
Almost half of patients wished for full disclosure of information regarding cancer diagnosis.
Over 90% patients wanted full information regarding all side-effects of chemotherapy. It is recommended
that training regarding how to break bad news be made mandatory part of our medical training both at
undergraduate and postgraduate levels.
related information.
Article Details
Work published in JPMI is licensed under a
Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 2.0 Generic License.
Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work.